Quote Gotcha="Gotcha"You see in his latter years I wasn't a fan of Scott Donald and thought he was here at least one season too many.
But your comment about his first 18 months is just wrong. There was nothing different to how Scott Donald played then and how Scott Donald played in his super league dream team years. The only difference was the specific stat of tries scored, and that in the main was effected by his centre partner. Too many people are influenced by that stat rather than the individual performance. Scott put in 3 seasons of good performances for us.
My own opinion always was and always will be that Calderwood would have matched and exceeded anything that Scott Donald did for us, but was not afforded that opportunity, and in that respect I agree with all that tvoc has put, except about Broughton. But then the club had to go for the next best thing, and I presume that was Scott Donald.'"
My opinion has never been greatly influenced by stats, which can always be interpreted in a variety of ways anyway. I have always preferred to base my views on what I see before me on the rugby field. To be honest, I can't remember Donald even playing for us in 2005, and I sat there in the North Stand for the better part of the 2006 season, wondering just when our Aussie chum was going to join in with the rest of the squad.
In 2007 and 2008 we got our money's worth, but I recall him being caught out of position many times in his Leeds career, and I still don't buy into the idea that it was down to whoever was playing inside him at that time. 2010 can be written off due to injury and early retirement, so I suppose it would be fairer to judge him over a 4 season period, where he would fare a bit better.
My overall impression of Scott Donald, irrespective of whether, with the benefit of hindsight we should have kept another, younger leeds prospect, is that we could have seen a cracking player on the wing for all of his time here, and sadly, we were shortchanged.