I suppose, but he's not a LF. Donno or Burgess should get played at LF with Langers in SR.

The thing about Langley is that he isn't a creative player. People are looking for him to do things he just doesn't do.



We're lacking creativity in general but we won't get it from Langley. He's there to defend. We need to recruit from outside to get some creativity for next year.

He's more of a loose than Sam Burgess will ever be.

In the game v France Burgess showed people what a LF is supposed to do.

Maurice Lindsay could have played LF against France and showed people what one was meant to do.

Maybe. There was a reason why Tony Smith picked Burgess for LF for England, and not Langley.

Burgess wouldn't have played loose though if O'Loughlin didn't pull out.

The past few games Sam has played at loose should be enough for anybody to see that he's never going to be a loose. Personally, I think he lacks the mobility and ball skills.

Against a French side that would have probably lost to Batley.

Burgess is a prop end of story.

Second Row for me.

Burgess is definatly a 2nd Row/Loose. He will burn out like Stuart Fielden if he carries on at prop, plus he has too much talent to play prop.

I hate it when people say this, it does a great injustice to fantastic skillful prop forwards. Look at Barrie Mac, the fella was a unbelievably talented ball player, so was Webcke.