No, it's just a few flat cap numpties in Wakey & Fev who hate Cas. Cas are the nation's favourite second team.

Have you seen our record with Thaler in charge, I can assure you it's not good. He always seems to go out of his way to ensure he doesn't get accused of bias in our favour.

I think you'll find Bradford are now everyone's officially sanctioned second team.

Apart from the RFL's, where you are clear favourites.

Obsessed and very envious, now go away the adults were having a bit of lighthearted, arent there any cars to rob on the peacock ????

You mean they don't hate you in here too yet ? How many usernames do you have on these forums now ? 12 ? One for each finger and thumb you own.

Sort it out in the playground at break eh kids?

Penalty Count in the first half - Wakefield 10-2 Bradford



Penalty Count in the second half - Wakefield 3-8 Bradford



Total penalty count Wakefield 13-10 Bradford

If a referee refs to a consistent standard through a whole match it should not matter what the eventual penalty count is. for them & for us.

In fair refereeing it then demonstrates a preponderance of deliberate of accidental breach of the rules by both sides.

So its unreasonable for anyone to complain that a certain side was penalised -say 10:2 - without looking at the validity of each decision, and of course, looking at penalty decisions that might have been made consistent with others actually made.

The Refs should not get to the stage where they have penalised a team 4 times then think they cant do another one, or at least penalise the opposition at least once in compensation.

But they do.

I would be interested to know how many tries come in the next set of 6 after each penalty.

Saturday gone Bradford scored three tries on the back of receiving penalties while Wakefield scored just the one try (Southern's).

While you are doing the commentary can you keep a tally for the rest of the season, there's a good lad.