Meant to add if people paid by DD or SO over say 4 monthly payments they could be charged an extra£10 to do so.

So the replacement team will then be judged and held to a higher standard than the other 13 teams? If the Bulls are to be relegated and another team comes in how is that even remotely fair to them. less time to prepare and a higher standard of compliance to be reached?



After 3 weeks it's unknown by any club involved (championship clubs who may be invited to apply, the Bulls, other clubs waiting for decisions from players) what the process is and how long this decision will take. The original licensing took months to review so any improved process isn't going to be completed by the end of the year.

Thats exactly what I am thinking and feeling at the moment aswell. Bizarrely I am more motivated about supporting the club now than at any point in the last few years and I don't think I'm alone. Bulls need to tap into that somehow and carry it through to next season.



Bullbuilder could also do with tapping into it now to get people signed up. Which reminds me...

Oh dear little man. You really do need to try and have a last word don't you?



Now you have to pretend you are getting under another posters skin.

Your grasp of psychology is worse than your grasp of evidence





The delay was down to OK's advisors / third parties / bankers. But you cling to your lightweight 'many people think it' explanation re the RFL...poor lil FA .....come on now show me your desperate need to have the last word...you know you have to.

I agree that a process usually taking months should not be rushed AND great care should be taken to ensure standards are fair for all.



So we can agree that expecting the RFL to create the new standards in under 3 weeks is foolish.



so RFL are not necessarily slow on this important issue.

If only you knew just how wrong you were in almost everything you said re FA above, right from the first few words!



Not being clever; just factual. As one day you might discover for yourself.



And FA ALWAYS has the last word - you really had better believe it!

I know the volume of support was great, the numbers travelling away was extremely good and there was a great bond between the fans and the players and coaching staff. But how many people were actually turning up at Odsal towards the end of the season? The actual crowds, as opposed to the announced attendances, didnt appear to be particularly large. And most of them were season ticket holders that had bought cheap tickets and might as well use them.



Similarly how many actually pledged, accepting that quite a few pledgers also donated on behalf of other members of their family?



I think it would be dangerous for OKB to plan on the basis that they would sell more than 5,000 full priced season tickets, particularly if the squad is weakened by departures.

I have read about these teenage crushes. This one you have for FA is a humdinger (is that the sort of word you kids use?). You probably think it is the real thing. But look at your gushing prose.





And that last line!



Does he really ALWAYS have the last word? Had I better believe it?

You make FA sound masterful.





I am breathless with anticipation at your next missive. I really am.



( I still believe that 'many people thinking so' is not meaningful evidence of the RFL have been slow, sorry about that.

)

There you go again, your feelings of inadequacy are a bit worrying. But no, I don't. I choose to reply to some posts, and it's a ssimple as that. You seem to be ignorant of the fact that by saying I "need to try to have the last word", you reveal only that you are miffed that your last post aimed at me wasn't "the last word".This is clear evidence (

that you're the one who sees it as somehow important. Either that, or you think your own ramblings were so inconsequential that they were not worth a reply, and therefore any reply can only be for the sake of "having the last word".



Which is it?





Incorrect. I have no knowledge whether I've got under your skin but

(a) I have ZERO interest in doing so; and

(b) I can only make deductions from your behaviour, which clearly indicates that, incidentally, I have. The toys whistling past my head from your pram are unmistakeable.





All of them, or is that your way of saying "Oh, sorry, maybe I was wrong" but can't face what you see as a climb down, so have to do a swerve?



Third parties - yes, to a point.



Bankers - well yes, but only if you blame them for being closed on a Friday night and at weekends,



Advisors - er, still no, and still not on holiday.













If you had commented on what I actually explained, and e.g. the evidence of the RFL quotes I troubled to cite, your response might at least have been worth reading.





Oops. I wasn't going to mention that sound thrashing I administered to you, but I see that got under your skin too. Let it go, man. Or, if you really can't, and feel compelled to continue with your car-crash of an argument, then I'll gently point out that it's your turn to answer, if you can, the points made. I haven't forgotten that you so far never have. Pavarotti?



Oh and I should mention that "many people think" that feet are no longer being dragged, but are indeed currently away on their toes and dipping for the line. But who knows, eh?

Now you are making yourself look, like, totally stupid. Everyone knows Adey hearts Justin Bieber. (Adey - he's a teenage pop star to save you googling it).

Curses. Cover blown. Now the buggers will expect me to buy the bloody club out of my small change.