According to wikipedia In 2001 Leeds' main urban subdivision had a population of 443,247 not 750,700

Couldn't agree more. Sometimes I think the people running the game have more of a flat cap vision for the game than the southern media!



The fact we can't attract a decent sponsor for SL is a disgrace and in itself should be enough to see heads roll.



We have a great product with terrible management.

We have a good on-field product, but are terrible at almost everything off the pitch. Poor stadia, poor marketing, poor attitudes, poor community involvement, poor management and poor media engagement. Some of it is the RFL at governing body level, but an awful lot of the problems are lower down the system.



The stadia is a difficult issue due to the high costs involved, however I would say that if clubs had invested in their stadium and facilities 30 years ago when there was a bit more money floating around, then there wouldn't be such big problems today.



The marketing from clubs is awful. Just awful. And it's not all about money, half the time it seems like clubs simply can't be d to try and attract new fans.



The attitudes at most clubs stinks. It's a mix flat-capped tery, a slavish obsession with "the past" when everything was apparently brilliant, and amateurism. The lack of clubs willing to attend best practice seminars for instance.



There is so much more clubs could be doing in their local communities. Clubs seem to think sending a couple of players to a local amateur a couple of times a season is enough. It's not, nowhere near. Engage with the community, get regularly into schools, colleges, universities etc. We often bemoan the fact that many RL clubs are based in small towns yet the clubs still don't properly engage with their local area.



The management of many RL clubs is terrible, based either on 1 mans ego, or being run like an amateur club on steroids. Clubs are in desperate need of professional management. I think this would avoid many other problems.



There are things the RFL could do to help, but I'm of the belief the main problems in the game can be solved by the clubs themselves.

There is of course then the amateur game, which in Yorkshire at least is often a disincentive to engage with rugby league for most people.

What's that then - 1983. OK then - where was this money that was floating around in 1983? Sky weren't even around then. Have you just dreamt that "fact"?



It's a regional sport which struggles to get national sponsorship and media attention. Ironically we got plenty of media attention back 40 year ago when a cloth cap commentator with a broad Northern accent catapulted our game into the national consciousness. It's never gone beyond that and I don't see any spark in smouldering embers that's going to change that anytime soon. This is our lot. Possibly? Or am I being a bit gloomy here? Maybe.

I didn't realise you wanted an exact date, I apologise for not specifying an exact year when it's not necessary or the point whatsoever. Congratulations on spectacularly missing it.

The years when RL clubs were spending money left, right and centre on player transfers or on union players and almost completely neglected their facilities and stadiums. Leading to the appalling state at some, and the enforced move of other clubs.

they aren't

So why the changes Smokey? Who's changing the game? Who's got the overriding votes?

No-one has voted yet and the proposal was that unpopular the split has moved to an end of season promotion competition which still may not end up being implemented.

The Dual Reg thing is the RFL trying to make SL more like NRL. In the NRL if you need match practice, you get thrown into the lower comp. The RFL were/are trying to emulate the NRL by using the lower league sides to the SL sides advantage for getting players fit or for players out of form.



We need to to reduce the amount of games. The problem with money is because of the current economic climate. Once that improves, so will the finances of the clubs and the RFL.



The RFL need to stick with licensing and only consider bringing more teams in when it can be proven that the competition sustain them and they can sustain themselves. Pick the most viable 12 clubs, put them in SL and keep it that way until the competition can sustain more clubs.



P&R had it's chance before and during SL era and it was a failure. Why do we need to bring it back? Licensing is only in it's infancy and needs to be persevered with. If we change now, I can guarantee within 5 years time, we'll find something else wrong and want to change the structure again. We need to give ideas time to bed in and grow not give up on them if they aren't an instant success.



We are trying to get all clubs to invest in youth and the seeds of that are starting to come to fruition at most clubs. By bringing back P&R, clubs are going to put more emphasis and money on staying in the top league rather than their youth structures which in turn will weaken the international game even more so than it is now.

Except when it's seen on TV. Then it appears colourful, vibrant and, most importantly, pretty full. As does Wakey's similarly decrepit ground. The contrast with the likes of Hudds is very apparent and even Wigan and Saints can look pretty dead at certain games. So perhaps less of a turn off than might at first seem the case.

That figure quoted for Wakefield is for the City only. Wakefield's population is 325,600 but if we get rid of the likes of Cas and Feath etc it's about 240k.

I don't think there is anything worse than massive empty stands on TV, which is what we get when teams are playing in shiney new stadiums but can only fill 20% of the capacity.