Neither is the UK version

I think it would be between Halifax and Featherstone with either the other or Toulouse to replace London for 2015.

Why?

If Fax were offered the place, they should grab it with both hands.

actually both have, as have sheffield as they made the GF last year

Rules are selective, they wont want to have a bidding contest, they will keep the contestants to a minimum, they need a quick decision , as they need to announce who it is in 4/5 weeks time

No , that qualifies them to submit an application for 2015-2018 , not the current period

I get you now, i stand corrected



not that it makes a difference really, i'm not sure i even want superleague the way it is currently being run

it would be easier for them to pick up more of bradfords players, it would be easier for their semi-pro players who were to step up to make that change, it would be easier for them to work out the travel arrangements and the effect on player performance, it took les catalans a year or two to sort that out.



Toulouse's costs will be higher with the additional travel and associated costs so they would need to make sure they could turnover enough to cover those higher costs.



Im not saying which one is best, just that in the immediate term Fax would find it a bit easier than Toulouse

Neither - Fev.



Bigger derby potential with Leeds, Cas and Wakefield.



Fax's nearest derby would be Hudds and Toulouse in this economic climate would be financial suicide.

Toulouse are already battle hardened to commuting the channel, 3 years in the Championship sorted that out, Mick Potter might fancy working in France again, and Bradfords Aussies might fancy some sunshine for a change, plus Faxs plans are highly speculative

Fev havent qualified for this licence period





All Toulouse need is the nod from a major sponsor, a 5 year tenure would swing it