Argument ??? I suggest you research what an argument is and the differences between that and a question. If Toulouse are upto SL get them in especially if the 8x3 comes in but would they just become another soulless club with a squad full of Aussies with 750 fans (as seen before)



Again what system do you propose to see if a European club is upto SL (Catalan) and which are not (Every other expansion club apart from Catalans) ???

When you ask implying questions, you're using it as an argument. The two aren't mutually exclusive. I suggest you leave that there.





They won't survive outside the top flight. As said, he logistics just won't work. A European league concept will only work if it's the top level IMO. There just won't be the sponsors or a TV interest to make it viable otherwise.

The logistics of getting a squad together to play every other week in another country whilst part time are the reason why it wasn't successful last time. No point in repeating the same.





I propose we follow the model that worked with Catalans at the very least.



I've offered another model on another forum that received a lot of support from other posters. I may put it up later but it's pretty long-winded.

I honestly think RL fans need to change their thinking on what the very top tier of RL needs to be. It should drive TV deals, media covg, corporate involvement, inspire kids to take up the game and be a showcase for what RL can be at it's very best. The notion that bringing in more clubs with small canvases, small stadia and no money within spitting distance of each other just to preserve the romantic notion of promotion is not the future IMO. A SL with fixed teams generating what the game needs to grow is what we need to aim for. The second tier can still be vibrant, draw people to play and watch the game and be worthwhile and if expansion of SL warrants it then by all means have a expansion programme.



I guess having lived with the NRL for over a decade now and seen the model work extremely effectively I am biased but the notion bringing in fev,fax or Leigh is going to change SL current problems is wishful thinkiing.

I'm OFF FOR A LIE DOWN!



...agreeing with you ain't right...it's just not kosher!

Again, I dont neccessarily disagree, but both SL and Championship clubs do, licencing isnt creating sponsorship,media,fan interest in the game at any level, and again it is THE SL clubs that want and have the power to change it



Lets not start blaming the lower tier clubs for this, all they can do is what they are told ,as for Toulouse, then yes with P and R, the only way you can bring them in is with the same safeguards the Catalans had

Very well put JB.

I'd only agree if we had 14 clubs that were pulling their weight. We don't. We have various clubs in financial strife performing poorly against many of the criteria unable to live with licensing. What's the point in keeping them in SL? All they're going to do is get in more debt, not build.



There are a large number of clubs of a similar level. Personally I think they should just go with P&R and give one if them a chance to break into a big club. Licensing is not only completely flawed, it's bloody dull.

Has anybody got a phone number or the home address of our resident faux Frenchman I'm starting to think something might have happened to him, I think somebody needs to pop round to make sure he hasn't choked on his frogs legs he should have been all over this thread

The reason NRL is massive and SL isn't has everything to do with history and culture and very little to do with promotion and relegation.

I very rarely post on this site but read it everyday and i was wondering what has happened to him toicon_smile.gif))))

Depends which way you look at it. Some say its less than 30,000 if you consider duplicate accounts and those with false addresses. Arguable that this figure has been exaggerated for the authors benefit.

not a tax man or working for a company that likes to send email blasts.