I hope not, but suspect so.



I would much rather we concentrated on supporting our own team than gave Myler any more reason to want to score against us (which he inevitably will).

Well you certainly sound like you are.

What do you mean at it again ?

Parker is injured so a ideal move would be Alker to second row.

IMHO Matty Smith would be a better hooker as his distribution at the PTB is very good.

Ratchford to SO and Holdsworth at SH.

You then have J Smith on the bench as a interchange.

That looks a exciting 3/4 line to me.

Whats wrong with that

4 positional changes to accommodate SR.

Only one required to replace Parker.

Thats what !

thats what i got told on sat night that mcrae doesn't like ratchford. Didn't give me a reason. We were both in agreement that ratchford is a quality player. Too good for 20's level anyway.

OK then what would you do ?

We need to replace Parker and against Warrington we need to stop Briers and Myler from wreaking havoc.

I always think attack is the best form of defence sowhat is your idea ?

Who does your lad play for mate?.. My lad is also playing in the curtain raiser for the game. He plays for oakwood.

499. Bloody recession.

Sibbitt for Parker.

Retain the shape and structure that defended well against Hull.

Simples.

that would be mine, sibbit for parker, maybe jezza for gibson

I wonder if we can go one better and win both halves 50-0 this year?

No.

Wire by 16, i think fitness will tell in the end but a resilient Salford effort, especially after the Hull win.

I can't see Salford rolling over this time and with it being a local game you'll put the extra effort into it