Quote worthing wire="worthing wire":3dbvwsczJesus Christ on a bicycle. Sue them, then.
jdrocket vs Warrington Wolves:
Case for the prosecution: "I want to go to the Saints game, and I might not be able to. It's not fair".
Case for the defence: "Man up, for crying out loud".
Judge: Case dismissed.'"
:3dbvwscz
I will most likely go to the game even if it is in the saints end. That is not the point. the point is and i will try and make it clear.
The club have moved the goal posts and made the buying of tickets (in this case) unfair.
My point was that it is unprofessional of the club. Not only would it be easier, but it would be fairer if they just sold them as usual.
It is about (and you probably won't understand this) principles. It is the principal of the matter.
Which brings me to my next point
Quote worthing wire="latchfordbob":3dbvwscz
[size=150:3dbvwsczOf course it's fair[/size:3dbvwscz. Somebody who's invested a few hundred quid v someone who can get up early just to get tickets for what might be their only game of the season. It's no contest.
Of course if there was a system where you could prove you go to all games, home and away this would be as valid as season tickets first method. But there isn't, and its not worth even setting up such a system for one game a year.
It's a good job you're not a United fan scrambling for one of a couple of thousand away tickets where being a season ticket holder might get you one away per season.'" without bias".
So that means with no showing of favour to one group of people. Say, season ticket holders compared to non-season ticket hodlers.
Checked on google "free from favoritism or self-interest or bias or deception"
Hmm still applies. You can say it is a lot of things but it is not fair!
And there in lies the principle. Think you can understand that?