Didn't London go bust in 2004/5, without penalty and continued to sign players?

Out of interest how many have signed a 1 year contract?? Greg Richards for example has signed for 2, and he doesn't strike me as a cockney

The delay was due to the introduction of the new cup competition I believe. The 1895 Cup.

Don't let facts get in the way, let the vultures continue to swirl bless em

You'll be right. They'll plug you with a parachute payment again. Hopefully you'll do better with it next time round.

Who's gone bust ?

Don’t think we could be classed as experts in the parachute regiment

Wasteful expenditure glow. But I and a couple more enjoyed the ride. Back to basics again.



Bring it on.

So what happens to London Broncos if the owners decides that he can't / won't continue to make up shortfall in funding?



Sustainable model indeed.

Now that feels like a familiar scenario! Where have we heard of that one before?

In the same position as us, just like the vast majority of other clubs if their own walks.

Correct.



Whilst there are plenty of goings on at the club that I feel have been handled badly (comms out from the club, players not being paid), But I also I feel that a lot of fans of other clubs are getting holier than thou at the fact that contracts were renegotiated. Halifax asked all the squad to take a pay cut after missing top 4 one year. Bradford sold season tickets then went bust. These aren't the first contract renegotiations and they wont be the last.



Then we get a London fan talk of their "sustainable model" because they have a few players on one year contracts (just like we did).