And I'd av kept Ellis over brierly in a heart beat. Just what we r lacking under rick stone.

How many tries did Wakey score?



Just curious since our defence was so poor? How often were they given the ball thanks to abysmal reffing? I assume we lost, since I was obviously watching a different game...



There was a spell of about 20 minutes when the game went their way, like all games ebb and flow but our defence was solid and Wakey made few inroads



To say we were poor is frankly ridiculous and about typical of the constant whining and defeatism on this forum

We were not poor but hardly world beaters. Play someone like Wigan or cas and would have been a different story on that showing. We are just expressing our concerns while happy with the 2 points! . I think it's a good 2 points considering the overall performance

Of course we aren't world beaters, and some folk need to remember that



This is a season with a cobbled together team and hamstrung by our awful last season, but they work damn hard and dug very deep tonight to get the win



100% guaranteed wed have lost that game last season



And we did it against 14 men

Happy with the result. Our indiscipline was the main problem.



I was glad to see smith back in the squad. I'm not writing Wakeman off yet but I think he needs a few weeks at Oldham to get up to speed. He's really lacking in defence falling off tackles, lacking a bit up top. It will come but I'd rather play Mason until Wakeman is ready. Mason earnt it after last season

I'm not sure Wakeman can play at Oldham Due to his visa.

......so our fastest player (at the moment ) is stood , static ! feeding the scrum instead of looking at the opposition defence positioning , and then making a decision on his options on attack



Sorry , but must be something Im missing here......................



9/10 times hes gonna pass it on - and be highly unlikely to get it back as it moves along the line (to slower players ?)



Just seems that 90% of the time we `re not using his pace at all on first play , but no doubt someone will explain all!*

Your missing nothing crackers. It doesn't matter who plays at 7- we've already seen this- they are always, always going to be overshadowed whilst ever brough is in our side as he takes over.

We nil a team in the second half and our defence is poor.



You couldn't make it up.



The problem in the first half was our line speed and intensity.



My gran could have made metres against us in the first half.



And she's 6 foot under.

I saw a game of good and bad from both sides but what I was really pleased about was that we were still playing right up to the final whistle.Pussies were blowing just after half time.

"“The game was heavily to Wakefield. Most games, it looked like in the first half, it would probably end 40-16."



Is this quote a repreesntation of the whining and defeatism on this forum? This is a quote from Rick Stone. Some people need to take off the rose tinted specs and be more objective, even the coach thought Wakefield dominated the first half of the game, and he is right. The difference today was that we took our chances when presented. If we are to make any inroads against the better teams, we simply cannot have a period of the game with Wakeman, clough and to be honest Hinchcliffe on in the forwards during which we will be totally dominated by the opposition. Like many are saying here i would give Mason a shot for wakeman at the moment.



Is it just me or is Hinchliffe also having zero impact whether he's at loose forward or hooker. What a waste of a substantial overseas wage!

How come Cudjoe didn't play? great to see yound Wood carrying on from his Oldham game last week. Thanks for only beating them by 8 and thanks to Jerry for your try, anytime try scorer 5 fold and handicap 5 fold up last night was constantly updating your twitter at the end ha. Love anytime try scorer bets when theres a few games

I thought we started well for the first 15 minutes and then really struggled against the bigger pack of Wakey, we could not stop their go forward and were lucky we had a good 15 and 2 tries, or they may well of been out of sight. Second half much improved, and in the last 20 we shone and was the better team overall at the end.



I thought Kruise, Seb and Ukuma had exceptional games, Jerry was good, Gaskell was fairly solid and the 2 centres had promising moments. Smith & Rapira stepped up in the second half and helped out the pack so we were not reliant on Seb and Ukuma to make the go forward and win the ruck.



It's teams like Wakey, Widnes, Leeds, Leigh and Salford we have to beat (we failed against the latter) as I think we will be some way off the others from what I have seen so far.



Wakeman has been a disappointment for me so far, but then I read he has not had a preseason so I will hold judgment on him for now, I think the harder ground will help his style later on, I hope so.



A good 2 points for us, we will need this after 23 rounds to help us avoid bottom 4.



I thought the ref was ok, think too many jump on the ref as for the excuse, certainly much better than the ref that did the Hull-Catalan game!

a good win . still ? over how fit they are look shot after 20 mins and there is a lack of speed . gave away to very soft try but came good at the end. i have no probles with HD we need to use brealey speed more brouugh should have put him under the post but kicked for gerry. wakeman did look better last night as for hinchcliffe does a lot of d like bruno like him at lf . this win should boost the conferdance see how the go on in next couple of weeks