Sorry teacher my mistake. I thought this was a rugby forum not a spelling and grammar contest.



I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum

I must not use bad spelling and grammar on a rugby league forum



I promise i wont do it again, please dont tell my mummy and daddy

If Carmont is Emile Heskey, you are Gazza.

AS i said earlier in this thread , if the ref had of stopped the game like he should have because Brent webb was down the wigan wouldnt have broke in the first place , they where fortunate to get a shot at goal to win the game after a kick to touch

Par for the course, Tommy was down for a full set, Alibert didn't stop the game then either.

didnt see Tommy's but its still a mute/moot point

Since when have rugby games stopped for a player down? The game didnt stop when we had a man down and i see plenty of occasions where players have been down and play continues.

if hes interfering with play or you have players running in his direction it should be stopped, if its backplay then it dosnt really matter , the fact that the ref never did this for Wigan dosnt really matter we arnt talking about the incidents that stemmed from that in this thread

Of course it matters! The ref should apply the rules evenly to both teams. Webb wasnt exactly slap bang in the middle of the action either was he?

The TL one was in back play, at the time looked pretty serious - face down motionless, that and Leeds pressing on our line was sending our fans into a frenzy.

Lets stop talking about Danny boys cheating and talk about Salary caps and Wigan,now that was cheating

Even though it wasn't, they had to make up a new law to penalise us for it.



Tell me the difference between what Fielden did (deferring part of his wage the first year to then be split across the subsequent years) to what Leeds have done with Lee Smith (which is where they had to pay him pittance in year 1 to fit him in the cap, with the promise of substantial increases the year after to make up for it).



Thats why we didn't break the cap, but we broke the "spirit" of the cap.

Mate dress it up all you want it was cheating,ask the people at Cas.