I couldn't make last nights meeting so could someone explain why the 'away' end gets covered (A on plan) whilst only half where the Trinity Faithful stand (B on plan) is covered.



Would Leeds have half the south stand not covered whilst their away end covered????

it would mean knocking stuff (the old hospitality building) down, which they are going to turn into another supporters bar.

Because we don't officially have an 'away' end, and that is the easiest place to put a roof that covers sufficient numbers to get us somewhere near the target.



Once the roof is on we can work on making it our 'home' end and get all our fans together under it.

Can't believe the best view in RL will have pillars blocking it.

thats progress, according to big Woodsy.

Very sad to lose that view but I accept it needs to be done, it would be nice to have a roof without the need for the pillars but if it is only for 2 years then it can't be worth the expense.

He'll Fire!



Do I detect a hint of positivity in that post!

Elston did say in the second meeting that they had received word yesterday that they now had funding in place to cover the whole of the western terrace even though the image doesn't show that. He added that this was something that is included in the plans that the architects are drawing up.

Very good.

Mate I'm mr positive all the time I had a bad day yesterday bit back on planet normal again.

What wasn't said last night and I don't know hence why I'm asking is PP needed to do this work because it wasn't said that the stands were temporary or if it was I missed it.

If PP is needed then we are cutting it a bit fine to get it resolved before July 26.

I think I am right in saying that PP wont be required for any of the work.