What has been said about agar on twitter by James then because it didn't show up on my feed?

correct and anyone knows that........but according to mable Syrup aka Vince Mcmahon the wakefield lads were so poor at wrestling they had to call on Andy Raleigh's vast experience from wrestling at the giants to show them how to win games !!! Lol a classic

you are angry aren't you. There has been a regime change from top to bottom as things needed to change. If you can't see or understand that, and have to get aggressive and insult people when they tell you something you either don't believe or can't understand, then a public forum may not be the best place for you.

Again.another series of comments full of negativity and suppostion with very little evidence to back any of this up. If things are so bad at Wakefield why the hell do you bother? Just walk away mate.Loads of people walked away when things got so bad they were emptying fruit machines to pay players and we had the world's biggest conman in charge, but somehow things seem to be moving forward now.If as i am rapidly starting to believe due to your constant negativity you are just a troll,fair enough, but bloody hell at least do your research.The loan issue was a non issue and so is every other post you trip out.

WWWILCAT48 The other week you came on the forum spouting on about we would never see moore or james in a wakefield shirt!

when they both played against sheffield you deleted your post! Is it because you were left with runny egg all down your face.

Why dont you leave Agar to run the team afairs stop knocking him and for a change try supporting our club instead of trying to bring it down. What i saw last sunday was the best rugby seen at belle vue for a long time yet you keep slagging Agar off! Give the bloke a chance stop spreading roumors and get behind the club.

Ever since friday 7th oct 2011 wwildcat48 has been slagging agar off!

Agar is a top bloke in friends with a lot of wakey fans are they all have faith in him, of he ha taken 'trouble' matt James out of the wildcats equation then there is a reason. Wakey may shock a feWw teams this year. In agar we trust!

Agar praised James when he played against Catalan, so don't know where this rumour has come from!

i probably get shot down for saying this, but really feel we could do with another prop that could make the hard yards required to get the backs moving, think we alittle light in this area but hope i am wrong as think rest of team is shaping up nicely tbh , lets hope we can get 2 points at widnes on friday

In the last few years this forum has collected a number of posters like you. In the know, can't be challenged and always always knowing better that the incumbent Coach. However you are without doubt the worst of the breed so far.



I actually feel sorry for you, such deluded self regard and importance cannot be easy to live with - trust me I know. Plenty have come before you, made themselves look foolish and gone - so turn the light off on your way out.





Oh and to all those joining in this ludicrous, pointless, groundless and boring prop obsession - he's gone for a month - yes a whole month - are we really going to miss our 5th/6th choice prop that much for four games - get a grip folks.

We have been through this as length - we have 6 props - the four starting props are all on the larger size. Plus in Marriano and Ali L we have two of the bigger S/R in the game.



I honestly don't think it possible to please Trinity fans. If we signed another prop we'd have to another group saying we were light on wingers or half backs - it never ends.



As it happens I think props and halfbacks are the two main areas to build and I'm happy enough with both compared to last year - Rome was not built in a day. Another would be nice but it's hardly worth the obsession on here.



Still I'm sure every loss rightly or wrongly will be blamed on that missing extra prop.

Come on everyone it's getting a bit repetitive especially for those who just want to get on and enjoy the season including the players

Think you are wrong, we are short of a prop