The first offer was lower then his current contract which in itself is unbelievable for a highly rated player and this offer meant that the regulations were adhered to when a better offer came in from Leeds.



Subsequent offers although still relevant do not change the rules back in our favour.



Pearson wanted to make a noise about it because he clearly thinks insider dealing has shafted our club on this occasion and I tend to agree with him.

So, without trawling back through the whole thread, was the first offer made by the previous administration?

Not sure of the exact timing, but all three offers were made while Rule was still handling player contracts. Certainly his signing for Leeds was announced after AP took over and Rule was still here.

Not sure if this has been mentionned anywhere else but didnt the guy in charge of Youth Development leave Hull suddenly around September time not long after Pearson took over?

Regardless of who the clubs are I'd rather be associated with the clubs that voted against it.



Crazy deal and apart from a few stobart spotters no one is seeing any real benefit from it.

May have been a bit green with the contract laws but he is spot on about the RFL.

Jesus you have to win one soon! It was well passed embarrassing a long time ago.

Find one sport where the fans think the governing body are great? Every sport has a bunch of fans who think the gov body are bent and favour one team. In football it's man utd. in baseball it's the yankies! Its People who can't face up to their teams own failings and jealousy of other success.

Snooker.

He said sport.



Snooker is played in long pants and as such cannot ever be classed as a sport

Cricket, motor racing, horse racing, American football, baseball all wear long pants of some form.

Hardly a compelling argument.