He's the one player that consistantly fails to perform to a decent level on both attack and defence, for the money he's on and the fact he's taking up a quota spot I'd let him go. FWIW I'd put him in the starting line up on Monday as he's brought next to nothing off the bench and he cannot be tired or injured for what he did yesterday.

Do you honestly think he's worth the money and quota spot for the 20 mins he spend on the pitch?



Yes we got a very good win, but he was carried for the time he spent on the pitch. I'd love to see the guy rip it up week in week out and see teams themselves when he gets the ball, but they know what he's going to do and that he's far too lightweight in attack............ And please dont get me started on his defence!



I walked past Hame in a shop a few weeks back and couldnt believe the size of the guy. Either he's being told to play that way or he's not bothered about putting in the effort anymore. The one thing about his game was his unpredictability but thats gone along with his aggression.



On recent performances and the highlights from France, I really dont see what he has to offer above the likes of Hutch and Hitro.

Whilst there are a lot of valid points being made, I do think it's unfair to throw the amount of minutes he plays against him. That's not exactly his decision. A lot are using Moa as a measuring stick, but I don't see the same people having a pop at him for coming off after only 12 minutes.



We don't share the work across our pack effectively and haven't for some time, but there isn't a single player that should be blamed for that.

Same here , There is far better players available for next season .

If he plays 10 mins per game but runs at the oppo like his life depended on it then I'd understand your comment. Whether he's on for 1 or 80 mins, he's lost, end of!

Half our pack usually does the full 80. It's ridiculous

The interchange strategy is mental

He is good enough for a quota player, we need he spot to sign a back.



Replace him internally with Green or Cunningham.



Be a poor decision is we keep him.

They'll all be knackered at the end of the season and we'll fade away to nothing like last year - only problem is that last year we were sat in 4th place when it started to happen

Really ought to be putting in the young forwards in place of Lauaki ready for next year. Why persevere with him unless he's going to get a new contract?

Got to justify paying big wages somehow.

When I first saw the size of him I thought we had someone who could steamroller defences.Then again,what do I know?, I thought the same about Hutch.