Yeah. Wouldn't be much incentive to move your family around the world knowing even if you make finals u could be binned!

Doubt very much that by Marketing New Passes on our return from Wembley they will then announce either of these as head coach - It would be the biggest disaster of Adams time in charge. In my view our offence is a mirror of Radford as a player.

Doesn't surprise me, I like Gentle but have major doubts now, not just because of this weeks final, but over the course of the season.



In attack we are as clueless as we where under Agar, and you could even argue we are worse because we no longer have Manu & Moa to creates gaps. His signings have largely been anonymous, with players like Johnson & Crookes not even making the team most weeks. We're 7th in the league, which is just where we where when he took over. The only area's we've improved is in defence and bringing younger players through.



I think he'll get the start of next season, but if we make another poor start he'll be on the next flight home.

The references to Uncle Kath and Agar does make you realise there is a bright side, even in the situation we are at the moment.

as much as I disliked Kath & Agar, are we really in a massively stronger positon now?



off the field we are stronger, and I am encouraged by the youth development and young players we have coming through, but on the field:



in 2011 we finished 8th, winning 13, drawing 1, scoring 718 points, letting in 569 points.



this year with 2 rounds to go we are 7th, having won 12, drawn 2, scoring 606 and letting in 492



as much as it pains me to say it: that isn't progress.



and before people say 'Gentle got us to Wembley' don't forget Agar did that too, and we put in a far better display against a Saints side that were a lot stronger than Wigan were on Saturday. Gentle has a lot to prove.

Yes. And anyone who can't see that has little idea of how success is achieved in professional sport.

I disagree, I think people are letting their personal option of Kath & Agar cloud their judgement of what Gentle & Pearson have done so far.



We are still the same average mid-table plodders we've been since 2008, and unless we have a string of top quality signings in the bag, I can't see 2014 being any different. In fact the squad so far looks weaker.

are you serious, investment off the pitch is massively different

OK so you tell us what infrastructure improvements were made by the previous regime. They were taking their dividends and investing nothing in the club. You can't undo these sort of things overnight. Adam has invested massively in the club and our youth set-up (the future of the club) is the envy of many. We, and most of the other clubs, cannot afford to be bringing over NRL stars who would be demanding a fortune, so we have to grow our own. If you can't see the good that's being done at the present time, then you're walking around with your eyes shut.

We have far, far better facilities off the field. We have a far better youth development system in place. Both of these are absolutely critical in building sustained success, and we would never have had them under the old regime.



We have a young and primarily English squad that has the [ipotential[/i to be developed into a top 4 side. Something else we would never have had under the old regime.



And we have an owner who is prepared to spend money on infrastructure, coaches, and players to achieve success. Once again, something we would never have had while Kath and co were around.



Only people who expected Pearson to wave a magic wand and transform us into world-beaters overnight could be dissapointed with the progress the [iclub[/i is making.

Ok just playing devil's advocate here but could someone please list the improvements that have been made of the pitch by Pearson and how much has been invested into these areas?

Are you serious?



Bishop Burton, no longer at Gordon Street to just start a fairly long list.