how was that even a try when the leeds player defo knocked on and yet the vidioe looked at the screen once i never saw it go backwards how could of it possible of been a try and what are these bloody touch judges even used for

it was a knock on. not sure how he came to that decision

Interesting spelling of 'video'.

Here we go again.

=#FF0000FYI As Bren2K is alluding to, mcmickeycas is a guy who regulaly posts on this site and suffers with Dyslexia ,so does very well to air his views on here , Irrespective of that, cheap points scoring off [uanyones[/u english skills is pretty low imo





Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)

It was definitely a knock on. The ref said it went back so he played on. Having second thoughts when Leeds scored he referred it to the video ref who obviously ruled no knock-on because he wanted to back the ref's original decision. Everyone in the studio said that it was a knock-on and Wells said the same at half-time. They are not usually unaminous because they like a bit of an argument.

A crucial decision was when Danny Orr was stripped of the ball and didn't get the penalty. Cas were only 4 points behind and the penalty would have put them on the Leeds' 20m line.

Lets not forget Ryan Hall being short for his first try too

They are a law unto themselves and how they didn't see what others saw is strange.

Terrible decision!!

Player touches ball behind line, ball bounces on line. Suggests a forward movement to me.

p.s what a terrible decision....

The easiest decision of the night was Chases forward pass for the 1st Cas try, but as we all know if it's only slightly forward it's OK. Stop moaning, the best team won.

The first Cas try where Daryl Clark dived over under the posts all by himself? Chase did well there then!