After listening to RH tonight i wanted to get peoples reactions...



They mentioned tonight about Hull not being a Top 4 club. They have everything needed to be up there, such as a big fan base, top quality stadium, making profits year on year and also a good squad. Fair enough 99.9% will give one reason why and say Richard Agar, but its not just Richard Agars years in charge where we havent being good enough. We have under achieved for a long time. We should have pushed on from the 2005 CC Win and getting to the GF in 2006. We have gone backwards dramatically.



The recruitment has been up there with the likes of Wigan, Saints, Leeds and Wire, bringing in the likes of Fitzgibbon, O'Meley, Swain, Berrigan, Kearney, Jason Smith Gleeson etc.



The board need to take a look at thereself and think is finishing below 4th position acceptable. IMO its not and things need to change soon. We need to take a huge look at Huddersfield who have broken into the top 4 this season, so far, and look to be on the way up.



Why do you think Hull have under achieved and what would you change to help get Hull were they actually belong?

The answer is still Agar.

kath hetherington

The top 4 clubs are Wire, Saints, Wigan and Leeds. I can't see us dislodging any of them anytime soon.



Throw Hudds into the mix and we are, at best, a top 6 club.



Getting rid of Agar will not, by itself, change that.

You've gotta start somewhere.

It means losing profits to be up in the top 4 as we have to pay out win bonuses

You have to remove the cancer,(kath), before you clear the cells(agar/rule), for all her rugby league knowledge, she is alledgedly letting friendship stand in the way of ambition we all crave!

Its not just Kath. She is only one of the directors and she alone does not control the club.



The fact is, none of them will be going anywhere until someone with the money to buy them out comes along.



I'm not holding my breath.

you can bet kath will be pulling most of the strings!

If she is its because the others are letting her.



All the directors only have one vote each and Kath does not have enough shares to get her own way without the agreement of at least some of the other shareholders.

You keep telling yourself that if it eases the pain

You've never met her then?



And as for her much lauded rugby knowledge, I think the last 3 coaching appointments tell us how much she really has